What has EQUAL achieved and what are the future challenges

Interview with Professor Peter Lansley

Since 1997 Professor Peter Lansley has been at the forefront of facilitating a stronger interdisciplinary community of researchers with the needs of older people and disabled people at the heart of what they do. As Peter steps down from full-time employment at the University of Reading, Trevor Cox from KT-EQUAL chatted to Peter about what had been achived in the last 15 years of EQUAL research and the challenges ahead.

Trevor started by asking what Peter thought had been the achievements in the EQUAL research for older people and those with a disability:

 

Trevor then asked about where we are today with ageing and disability research and whether we were in danger of losing what had been gained through EQUAL:

 

What are the differences between the research councils?

 

Given his extensive knowledge of ageing research, Trevor wondered what the challenges for the future might be:

 

Finally, Trevor asked Peter what would be his main advice to a new researcher starting out in ageing research.

 

What do you think we learn from past EQUAL research, and what are the challenges? Please comment below.

 

 

Posted in Interview | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Getting impact from ageing research

Trying to get Impact from ageing research needs central investment in Knowledge Transfer

Gail Mountain

Professor of Health Services Research (assisted living research), University of Sheffield

We are in the middle of a slow revolution which, although uncomfortable for some, is undoubtedly essential. Academics are being asked to consider not only the output but also the consequences of their work. Put simply, we are being asked to answer the question “So What?” when we talk about our research. Academics have to second guess the long term outcomes from their research ideas when they apply for funding including how impact is going to be achieved. And judging by many of the grant applications I have seen as a referee, researchers are really struggling with this.

But concerns about the relevance of research are not new. Several years ago, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), showed considerable leadership and courage by investing in networks of academics skilled in knowledge transfer. I am director of the KT-EQUAL Consortium – knowledge transfer for extending Quality of Life of Older and Disabled People. Given the current move to embed resources for impact within each, individual research project, should overarching networks such KT-EQUAL be quietly wound up, shelved and consigned to history? I am concerned that lessons from this experimentation are going to be lost.

Since the late 1990s there have been many different funding calls from the research councils acknowledging that multidisciplinary research with the end user at the centre of research activity was vital to meet the needs of older and disabled people. Alongside this, Professor Peter Lansley at the University of Reading won support for a parallel EQUAL network. This provided a coordinated approach to disseminating the research but also, crucially, to obtaining ideas on what was needed from a whole range of stakeholders including older and disabled people themselves. Many workshops for all-comers were convened and an enthusiastic membership emerged.

When EQUAL completed in 2001, funding was obtained from EPSRC and BBSRC for a second network, SPARC (Strategic Planning for Ageing Research Capacity) which included small amounts of funding for future leaders in interdisciplinary ageing research alongside advancing the successful workshop programme. A whole community emerged, together with cadre of researchers that have been equipped to work in non traditional ways. SPARC cost £1.75M, and investigators on the pilot projects produced nearly 200 publications; by 2008 they had gone on to secure additional £10M to continue their research. There were other significant, less quantifiable gains: scientists learnt to communicate and discuss their work with older people, their careers and professionals; better understood the value of having older people involved in the research and came to realise that that practitioners and older people have as much right to hear about the latest research findings as do scientists. SPARC’s success shows what can be achieved from central investment in Knowledge Exchange.

It is into this arena that KT-EQUAL was launched in 2009. We have a greater focus on knowledge exchange with industry and government, and improved practice of engagement to maximize the benefits of historical investment into EQUAL via entrepreneurial and business activities. Crucially, a broader range of expertise was drawn upon, including the skills of an EPSRC senior media fellow, a lobbyist and a communications officer. This was considered important as the skills of a traditional academic do not necessarily extend to conveying research into easily digestible formats. This is the first advantage of centrally funded knowledge transfer. To create true impact a collaboration of experts is necessary to ensure an optimal skill mix. Only the rare individual can achieve greatness in all areas of modern academic life: as an intellectual, a researcher, a teacher, a writer, a populariser, and an entrepreneur. More realistically, one needs a team with a range of experiences.

Three research consortia are the hub of KT-EQUAL and have had notable impact on policy, industry and practice levels which have been facilitated through the resources of KT-EQUAL. For example, I’DGO (http://www.idgo.ac.uk/) has been so effective in achieving impact on policy, policy makers and practitioners, that the project featured as a case study in a major report on the value and impact of research − Making the Case for the Social Sciences: Ageing − published collaboratively by the British Society of Gerontology, the Academy of Social Sciences & AgeUK and launched at a ministerial Q&A led by Baroness Greengross in Westminster in July 2010.

Other activity has involved identifying new communities of interest and exploring alternative means of engagement. Having long term funding gives us scope to experiment and try out new ideas. To give one example, at a Question time Event in Edinburgh, a rare confluence of delegates including patients, third sector agents, industrialists, politicians, health care professionals, engineers and academics engaged in a lively, and at times uncomfortable, debate about how to bring integrated solutions to the problem of pain management. Solutions ranged from computer assisted devices to reduce social exclusion, adaptations to city living to improve mobility, and methods of engineering for patients with complex combinations of disease. This event was unlike any other event ever held in pain management and has already stimulated both political questions in the Scottish Parliament, and new research collaborations.

Consortia with central funding can also overcome some of the problems of timing and impact. While it is true that knowledge transfer can and should inform and stimulate high quality research, it is a virtuous circle rather than something that happens at the end of a research programme. The right moment, where both the researchers and the users/industry are both able to work together to create impact, can be years after a project is completed. At the point of readiness, academics may need assistance with strategies to reinvigorate their engagement with the original work.

I have witnessed how overarching projects add unique insights into knowledge transfer and add value to the distributed and fractionalised group of researchers attempting to develop interdisciplinary ageing research. I worry that the dynamic community of stakeholders and researchers that have been developed will be lost and dispersed if funding just goes to individual research projects.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Media Fellowships Opportunity

The British Science Association run a Media Fellowship scheme for researchers at any stage of their career to spend the summer working with national news journalists to improve their communication skills and media awareness. See details below about this fantastic opportunity.

…………….

Be behind the headlines!

Scientists, social scientists, engineers and clinicians can experience life in the heart of the newsroom by applying for a British Science Association 2012 Media Fellowship.

Spend 3-8 weeks this summer working with hosts including the BBC, Guardian and Nature to produce accurate, well-informed news about developments in science, and work alongside the UK’s top science editors in the British Science Festival Press Centre.

Return to work with media confidence, contacts, and first-class communication skills.

“I came away brimming with ideas, skills and advice for my researcher peers and I met some amazing people with the same values and drive as me. It was extremely interesting, educational and fun I would recommend it to anyone with an interest in the world outside their research bubble.” Media Fellow

Apply online from 16 January – 11 March 2012

We welcome applications from researchers at all stages of their career and for eligibility criteria, experiences from past Media Fellows, and the online application form go to www.britishscienceassociation.org/mediafellows

Sponsored by RCUK, Wellcome Trust, BBSRC, STFC and the IET

………..

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Active Ageing Seminar 2012

Are you an exercise instructor or leader working with older adults?

Do you lead or manage fitness or physical activity programmes with over 50s?

Are you interested in improving independence, mobility and wellbeing amongst older people?

The Active Ageing Seminar 2012 will inform and inspire all wellness professionals who work with or would like to work with older adults.

Following the success of our seminars in 2010 and 2011, we are pleased to announce details for the 2012 Active Ageing Seminar. Seminar delegates will enjoy hearing from and meeting a selection of inspiring speakers. There will also be structured group discussion and networking sessions. The morning sessions will focus on reaching out to our target and marketing our services. In the afternoon we will look at successful programme delivery and client retention. Topics covered will include:

  • Active Ageing Update
  • Marketing: Focus on Branding, with Nordic Walking UK case study
  • Using the New Functional MOT to raise awareness and increase participation
  • Exercise and Cognitive Function: what you need to know and how ‘brain fitness’ can be used as a marketing and retention tool.
  • PAR-Qs: latest developments, best practice and what this means for the industry
  • Age Appropriate People, Places & Programmes

When? Wednesday 2nd May, 9.30am – 4pm

Where? Woburn House Conference Centre, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HQ

*With thanks to our event partners: HUR Health & Fitness and Later Life Training.*

Earn REPs CPD points for attending (points applied for – endorsement from SkillsActive pending).

The 2012 Active Ageing Seminar will inform and inspire exercise instructors and teachers; physical activity leaders; occupational therapists; physiotherapists; exercise specialists; physical activity coordinators; public health professionals; health club managers and anyone else working in or interested in learning about older adult wellness.

For further details, programme and online booking, please visit Vida Network.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Inclusion and Diversity in Active Ageing

“A celebration of diversity and inclusion in active ageing”

The 8th World Congress on Active Ageing in August of 2012 in the City of Glasgow, Scotland. Held every 4 years, this showcase event will take place over 5 days in the prestigious Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre adjacent to the historic River Clyde. It will present a unique opportunity to bring together scientists and practitioners, experts and enthusiasts from a range of professional interests and disciplines involved in the promotion of Active Ageing.

In the London Olympic Year of 2012 the Congress will be an event that will not only highlight the latest research evidence and best practice on physical activity and active ageing, but also highlight the needs of an often excluded but growing population group world-wide, the oldest old.

Local and Scientific organising committees are already working with key partner agencies on a programme of keynote papers, thematic symposia, networking events, poster sessions and practical workshops. These will cover a range of conditions and topics related to ageing, but also meet a wide range of professional interests including motivation, measurement, the environment and professional development and training. You will also be offered a range of social and participatory events and opportunities to become acquainted with the vibrant City of Glasgow and the beautiful country of Scotland.

For more information, please visit http://www.wcaa2012.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ESRC Seminar on older people and technological inclusion: ‘Understanding usability’

10.30-4.00 on Friday 17th February at The Open University

In this seminar we aim to review concepts of usability, looking at different perspectives on whether, when, how, and why people engage with various technologies at different times in their lives and in different circumstances. What happens in the real world? How do older people appropriate technologies, or parts or aspects of technologies, to suit their own purposes and priorities?

See website for details and registration: www.technologyandageing.info

Speakers:
Professor Anthea Innes, Bournemouth University
Professor Leela Damodaran, Loughborough University
Mr Marc Harnett, Ricability
Dr Marie Sjölinder, Swedish Institute of Computer Science
Dr Farshid Amirabdollahian, University of Hertfordshire
Dr Ruth Sims, Loughborough University

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Experiences of impact

Gail Mountain, Professor of Health Services Research at Sheffield University talks about some of her experiences with Impact and ageing research. First, Trevor Cox asked her about recent grant applications and impact statements she has seen. Trevor asked what made a poor impact statement:

 

 

When asked for a tip on writing an impact statement, Gail suggested using a table:

 

 

Impact does not just have to be about product development. When asked about an impact case study, Gail described how research processes created impact in the Future Bathroom Project:

 

 

You can read more about working with industry to create impact here and more advice on writing impact statements.

What are your experiences with impact statements? Good or bad, please comment below.

Posted in How to guide | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Industry and ageing research impact

How to get impact in ageing research by working with industry

The most rewarding engineering I have ever done was developing products which are used by industry. I can walk around buildings and point at objects that I actually designed! It also keeps the impact bean-counters happy. But achieving that wasn’t easy and took an unbelievably long time. So I thought it would be useful to capture some tips about how this might be done in ageing research.

I started by talking to Ian Hoskins from the Engineering Design Centre at the University of Cambridge. In our phone interview he described his involvement in inclusive design and how to create impact from academic research for older people and those with a disability. As Ian worked for over 20 years in industry before moving to Cambridge University, he has a unique insight into both academic and industrial work in inclusive design. Including how academics can create impact in ageing research and inclusive design, and convincing companies to use research.

I started by asking him what inclusive design adds to a design process

 

I went on to ask Ian about the Inclusive Design Toolkit and he talks about the design process and how inclusive design can be integrated into it.

 

I finally asked Ian what tips he had for academics wanting to create impact in ageing research

 

What is your experience of working with industry? Any questions about impact and ageing research we haven’t answered? Please comment below

Posted in How to guide, industry | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How to write an impact statement for ageing research

How to write an impact statement for ageing research

Many researchers are grappling with how to write an effective impact statement for research applications. And judging by some of the applications KT-EQUAL investigators have seen, many impact statements are poor (e.g. wildly over ambitious). I thought it would be useful to put together a guide on how to write better impact statements. It will have a bias towards research which falls within the EPSRC remit and which addresses older people and people with a disability. I hope this should also create more impact in the long term, rather than being a blagger’s guide!

Over the next few months I intend to create links from this document to case studies showing how KT-EQUAL investigators and others have created impact. The research councils already provide some outline guidance on Completing the Pathways to Impact document, and EPSRC provide some specific advice on impact.

This is how I’ve gone about writing impact statements in the past:

What could the research be used for?

Why not start by brainstorming all the possible uses for the research you want to do. Start to think very broadly and think long and short term, but always stemming from your research. Later you’ll need to get more realistic about what can really be achieved. Think about the uses of the research in different ways:

  • What new knowledge is being developed which might have uses beyond your immediate research project?
  • What products might be developed which could be commercialised via industry, spin-out companies, patent royalties to create economic impact through wealth generation?
  • What products, services or procedures might you develop which could have economic impact by making the public sector (e.g. NHS, local government), third sector (e.g. charities) or industry more efficient?
  • How can the research contribute towards evidence-based policy-making, influencing policies, regulation and legislation locally, nationally or internationally?
  • How can your research transform professional practice for those working with older people?
  • How will your research improve the health and quality of the lives of older people, those with a disability, their careers and families?
  • How is the research going to develop the skills of people e.g. the researchers on the grant?

Don’t forget that it doesn’t just have to be about making money and the mediatisation or symptomatic treatment of health problems. Research councils also permit impacts about Enhancing cultural enrichment – a pompous way of saying having fun or doing interesting things!

Have I forgotten any categories? Please leave a comment at the bottom if I have.

Who could use the research?

You could now carry on brainstorming but thinking of beneficiaries rather than uses for the research. Beneficiaries might include:

  • Older people
  • People with a disability
  • Those who care for others
  • Professionals who work with older people and those with a disability
  • Other researchers
  • Industry who produce products and services in the area of your research
  • Public sector organisations and charities who commission and/or provide services for older people and those with a disability

You might also want to think of broader impacts on the general public, for example addressing issues of social cohesion.

Tips on getting impact with industry with ageing research.

Have I forgotten key beneficiaries? Please leave a comment if I have.

What agendas will the research impact upon?

Governments and funders have agendas such as the ageing population which they want to address in research projects. Directly addressing these issues and parroting the language used in relevant documents is a powerful technique. For example, EPSRC has Challenge Themes you should read these and try and address one or more of these if possible.

Consult others

There are likely to be impacts and uses for your research that you haven’t envisaged, so it is vital you talk to others. In the first instance this might be colleagues, but it is important that stakeholders (older people, organisations representing older people, industry etc) are involved in these conversations. By discussing what uses the research might have, you also start to open up a conversation about how these stakeholders might support getting impact from the research findings. Achieving impact from research about the ageing population is nearly almost always going to require working with outside organisations.

There are many pitfalls in working with users and stakeholders, in the future I’ll pen some words about this and get some case studies.

How to get impact

For each of the possible impacts you have brainstormed, you could think about how that impact is going to be achieved. This is also a good starting point for getting realistic about what can be done. An impact statement needs to have a set of defined work items (seminars, meeting to liaise with companies, proposing work items for standards committees etc, etc). It needs to be clearly say:

  • What you plan to do and what you hope this will achieve?
  • Why this is an effective way of getting impact?
  • When are you going to do it?
  • Who is going to do the work working with which external organisations?
  • How much will it cost?

One complication with impact statement is that it is easy to produce actions “we will talk to 30 companies about the new widget X” but there is no guarantee that these actions will result in impact (e.g. a company commercialising the widget). Don’t worry, impact statements naturally have actions for which it is impossible to know for certain if it will achieve long term impact. The important thing is to have a set of actions which are likely to work and follow best practice.

A personal plea from an ex-media fellow, don’t forget that public engagement is a valid and important way of gaining impact – increasing public engagement in science, economic and societal issues. As ageing research often involves working with older people, careers and professionals, you need to consider carefully how the groups of people you worked with can directly gain from your research.

When to get impact

It is easy to fall into the trap of believing that engaging with others and creating impact only happens at the end of the project once the research is complete. By setting up ways you can communicate with stakeholders throughout the project (during proposal development through to the end of the research), it is more likely your research will create something that stakeholders find useful and will exploit with you at the end.

Intellectual property rights (IPR)

You need to take advice from your organisation about IPR. There can be tensions and conflicts between yourself and collaborating organisations, and between being open and publishing research findings and the need for commercial confidentiality to allow exploitation. The earlier you have discussion about these issues with yourself and collaborators, the better.

General hints

Research council applications have a separate Academic Beneficiaries section so some of the impact ideas you dream up will be better in that part of the application. You need to describe your track record in knowledge exchange and to explain the resources required. Getting impact normally requires sustained effort over many years, so make sure you allow enough time and resources to make it work.

EPSRC have a list of hints, which include:

  • Think ‘outside the box’ and be creative and innovative.
  • But be realistic and don’t over-egg the pudding.
  • Avoid sentences using the phrase ‘the usual…’.
  • Don’t waffle – only use as much of the two sides as you need.

One of the best hints is to look at the review criteria. The new responsive mode reviewer forms have two boxes relevant to Impact:

Importance: Please comment on the national importance over a 10 to 50 year time frame in relation to other research in the area and how the proposal demonstrates how the research would underpin or contribute to:

  • Other research areas
  • Societal challenges (including EPSRC challenge themes)
  • The success of the UK economy
  • Emerging Industry

and

Impact: Please comment on the pathway to impact identified for this work particularly:

  • How complete and realistic are the impacts identified for this work
  • The effectiveness of the activities identified to help realise these impacts, including the resources requested for this purpose
  • The relevance and appropriateness of any beneficiaries or collaborators

You need to make sure your impact statement is written in such a way as to enable reviewers to answer these questions positively.

Finally

Have you any hints on writing impact statements? Or ideas of case studies which would be useful? Please comment below.

Posted in How to guide | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

CARDI & KT-EQUAL event – Not Lost in Translation

Rights 4 Seniors have added a lovely write up to the recent KT-EQUAL/CARDI workshop that highlighted how delegates could communicate most effectively with non-academics rather than have their words “Lost in Translation”.

The event was organized by the Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland (CARDI) in partnership with KT-Equal, a consortium of researchers dedicated to improving the quality of life of older people. From the delegate list, which included IT experts, doctoral students, Age Sector professionals and researchers, it was apparent that Rights 4 Seniors would gain a lot from the day.

Interestingly, even though this was an academic pitch, each and every seminar was animated and highly accessible. Come to think of it, it would have been ironic, I suppose, if this was not communicated most effectively.

Dr. Roger O’ Sullivan (CARDI) and Professor Trevor Cox (KT-Equal) introduced the day and encouraged the delegates “to tweet” during the event which was being streamed online for the world to see. This showed delegates immediately how old and new media could interact to ensure effective communication.

Where did Speed Dating Come Into It?

Robin Webster, the Chief Executive Officer of Age Action Ireland, set the tone for the day. Technology can be used to the greater benefit of us all but, when dealing with dementia sufferers especially and fellow humans in general, never forget the human touch – smile! This proved to be a useful reminder straight away as the first workshop of the day was… Speed Dating! Well, communication speed dating as this was not that type of conference.

This exercise taught us to cut out the waffle, get straight to the point and learn to listen. As it happened, it set us up rightly for the coffee break.

Professor Gail Mountain (KT-Equal and University of Sheffield) then took to the stand to tell us the secrets of successful bid writing. Again clarity and succinctness was the key although Professor Mountain said it better: “Don’t over-egg the pudding”.

James McEldowney, Deputy Principal, Office First Minister and Deputy First Minister, took us into lunch with a passionate seminar about how our words, carefully weighted, could affect policy and policy-makers.

The KT-Equal team introduced the next seminar and workshop which allowed us all to test our new-found skills in headline, blog, and tweet-writing.

It was apt too that Professor Alan Newell, University of Dundee, closed the day. Not only was Rights 4 Seniors aware of his work in engaging older people in research and IT, but we were lucky enough to meet with him too. Indeed, we will look forward to his next publication which is due to hit the book-shops soon: Design and the Digital Divide.

Access these presentations via our website.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment